Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/cpufeature: Get rid of the non-asm goto variant

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Jan 21 2016 - 13:59:39 EST

On 01/21/16 10:34, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> I can simply quote hpa from the mail:
> "Get rid of the non-asm goto variant and just fall back to dynamic if
> asm goto is unavailable. It doesn't make any sense, really, if it is
> supposed to be safe, and by now the asm goto-capable gcc is in more wide
> use. (Originally the gcc 3.x fallback to pure dynamic didn't exist,
> either.)"
> Booy, am I lazy.

Laughed-at-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>