Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO
From: Shuah Khan
Date: Thu Jan 21 2016 - 18:17:10 EST
On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the
> changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET
> when used with ADJ_NANO.
> I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced
> more unit tests to validate these going forward.
> Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/urgent?
> Shuah: The kselftests patch can wait to the next merge window
> if you'd prefer.
Yeah. Probably it has to wait until the next merge window as
this is a new test. I can pull this into linux-kselftest next
after merge window closes.
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978