Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] clk: at91: make IRQ optional and register them later

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri Jan 22 2016 - 10:40:50 EST


On 2015-12-04 18:03:39 [+0100], Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
> index 295b17b9c689..296d20a29c6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
â
> + pmc->irqdomain = irq_domain_add_linear(pdev->dev.of_node, 32,
> + &pmc_irq_ops, pmc);
> + if (!pmc->irqdomain)
> + return 0;
>
> -static void __init of_at91sam9n12_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
> -{
> - of_at91_pmc_setup(np, &at91sam9n12_caps);
> -}
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(at91sam9n12_clk_pmc, "atmel,at91sam9n12-pmc",
> - of_at91sam9n12_pmc_setup);
> + regmap_write(pmc->regmap, AT91_PMC_IDR, 0xffffffff);
> + ret = request_irq(pmc->virq, pmc_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_COND_SUSPEND, "pmc", pmc);

You need IRQF_NOTHREAD here becuase pmc_irq_handler() is demuxing
interrupts / invoking generic_handle_irq().
However regmap_read() inside pmc_irq_handler() is taking a sleeping lock
on -RT so this is not going to fly. So either get rid regmap_read() in
the handler or use handle_nested_irq() instead.

> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

Sebastian