Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a
From: Han Xu
Date: Fri Jan 22 2016 - 12:31:07 EST
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > This patch set is used for add the fsl-quadspi support for ls1021a and
>> > ls1043a, so remove the patch:
>> > mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: extend support for some special requerment.
>> Please use --cover-letter to generate cover letter.
>> > This patch will be send with anther patch set for add QSPI support on LS2080A.
>> > All the new property are document in anther patch set which is already
>> > send to linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Here is the patch name:
>> > 0001-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-dspi-compa.patch
>> > 0002-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-qspi-compa.patch
>> > 0003-dts-ls2080a-update-the-DTS-for-QSPI-and-DSPI-support.patch
>> > 0004-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-optional-properties.patch
>> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork:
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/
>> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable.
> Thanks for your review.
> But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and some corresponding maintainer.
> Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately.
> So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer.
> How about your think?
Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related
sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story.
> Yuan Yao.