Re: [linux-review:James-Hogan/kbuild-Remove-stale-asm-generic-wrappers/20160119-183642] d979f99e9cc14e2667e9b6e268db695977e4197a BUILD DONE
From: Fengguang Wu
Date: Tue Jan 26 2016 - 00:36:03 EST
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:30:50PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> Sorry for the delay! I lost access to my email account for some week.
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 19:27:55 kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > arm allnoconfig
> > > arm at91_dt_defconfig
> > > arm at_hdmac
> > > arm ep93xx
> > > arm imx_v6_v7_defconfig
> > > arm iop-adma
> > > arm marzen_defconfig
> > > arm prima2_defconfig
> > > arm sa1100
> > > arm samsung
> > > arm sh
> > > arm spear13xx_defconfig
> > >
> > Hi Fengguang,
> > Sorry for hijacking this thread. I have never seen the list of arm defconfigs
> > you are building before, and it seems to be a surprising selection, as a number
> > of platforms (ep93xx, iop, sa1100, spear13xx) are rather obscure, but the
> > configurations that I tend to use most (multi_v7_defconfig, multi_v5_defconfig,
> > allmodconfig) are not included.
> > Do you always build the same set of configurations, or is this a different
> > each time?
> There are a fixed set of config files for fast build tests (which I
> selected randomly, feel free to ask me to change the list to more
> reasonable ones):
And there is another set of best effort configs whose priority is
in-between the above list and the arch/*/configs/* ones.
> The more configs included in arch/*/configs will be tested in a more
> slow pace. So not included in this email does not mean they are not
> tested -- they are likely not quick enough to catch this notification
> > Can you always include the three I mentioned?