Re: [PATCH] genirq: fix trigger flags check for shared irqs

[Brian Starkey]

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for taking a look at this.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:45:32PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> > For shared interrupts, if one requester passes in any IRQF_TRIGGER_*
> > flags whilst another doesn't, __setup_irq() can erroneously fail.
> >
> > The no-flags case should be treated as "already configured", so change
> > __setup_irq() to only check that the flags match if any have been
> > provided.
>
> What happens if that "already configured", i.e. the default setting, is
> conflicting with the newly requested interrupt?
>
> I rather prefer the failure than the resulting silent wreckage.

Yes, I agree that would be best avoided. It seems to me that this case
is actually handled a bit lower down:

	} else if (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) {
		unsigned int nmsk = new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK;
		unsigned int omsk = irq_settings_get_trigger_mask(desc);

		if (nmsk != omsk)
			/* hope the handler works with current  trigger mode */
			pr_warning("irq %d uses trigger mode %u; requested %u\n",
				   irq, nmsk, omsk);
	}

Perhaps that should be louder/fatal?

Best regards,

-Brian

> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx