RE: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
From: Bharat Kumar Gogada
Date: Thu Jan 28 2016 - 09:20:13 EST
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver
> to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
> On Thursday 28 January 2016 13:20:56 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host
> > > Bridge driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 14:33:45 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -705,7 +715,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_probe(struct
> > > > > > platform_device *pdev) #endif
> > > > > > pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> > > > > > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > > > > > pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle,
> > > > > > of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
> > > > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
> > > > >
> > > > > Here it looks like microblaze gets it right. I'm not sure why we
> > > > > still need the
> > > > > pci_fixup_irqs() on ARM, but my feeling is that this should be
> > > > > fixed in common code.
> > > > In arm pci_fixup_irqs is called by pci_common_init_dev
> > > (arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c), since this API is removed now, I was
> > > calling it separately.
> > >
> > > But who calls it in microblaze? If it works without the extra call
> > > there, can we make it work the same way for ARM?
> > >
> > In microblaze I have added pcibios_add_device call (similar to call in
> > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c ) in pci-common.c, which is being invoked by
> > kernel core itself.
> I see. In the upstream code you seem to do it in
> pcibios_setup_bus_devices(), while arm64 and powerpc do it in
No that function is not getting called with generic API's, its getting called with pcibios_init flow which is tightly bound with struct pci_controller microblaze specific structure. So I added pcibios_add_device in pci-common.c.
> > May be we can add similar on arm and test out, but we might need some
> > cleanup in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> I think that would still just be a half-baked solution. This should really be fully
> automatic. We could do it in the __weak
> pcibios_add_device() for all architectures that don't override it when the bus
> was probed from DT, or we could do it in pci_read_irq().
When will pci_read_irq() call get invoked ?