Re: [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: use correct pipe FIFO size
From: Andy Gross
Date: Thu Jan 28 2016 - 23:39:22 EST
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:18:33PM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> >>> This is just using the #define. That is ok, but if you use this instead of the
> >>> BAM_P_FIFO_SIZES then you need to fix your comment. Or actually use the
> >>> register value.... otherwise looks fine.
> >> I did not follow your comment, but the intension of the patch is to set
> >> the proper FIFO size in BAM_P_FIFO_SIZES register, i.e. 32K - 8.
> > Sorry, I mixed up the usage and was thinking there was something you read out
> > that told you the size. That's not how it works, unfortunately. The
> > MAX_DATA_SIZE is fine, but the name is a little misleading. Perhaps just
> > BAM_FIFO_SIZE?
> OK I can rename BAM_MAX_DATA_SIZE to BAM_FIFO_SIZE, and use it when
> setting BAM_P_FIFO_SIZES register. Is that fine to you?
Yes that's fine with me.