Re: [PATCH 00/11] sync framework de-staging: part 1 - clean up

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:47:20PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2016-01-25 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Hey,
> > 
> > Op 21-01-16 om 13:49 schreef Gustavo Padovan:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following patches are some clean ups on the sync framework before
> > > we start the actual de-staging. The main changes here are the move of
> > > SW_SYNC_USER to debugfs. Removal of struct sync_pt in favor of direct
> > > use of struct fence. And the rename of sync_fence to sync_file, a name
> > > to better reflect what it is for, a struct that connects struct fence(s)
> > > to a file.
> > >
> > > Please review. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Gustavo Padovan (11):
> > >   staging/android: fix sync framework documentation
> > >   staging/android: sync: remove interfaces that are not used
> > >   staging/android: remove not used sync_timeline ops
> > >   staging/android: create a 'sync' dir for debugfs information
> > >   staging/android: move SW_SYNC_USER to a debugfs file
> > >   staging/android: rename sync_fence to sync_file
> > >   staging/android: rename 'sync_pt' to 'fence' in struct sync_fence_cb
> > >   staging/android: remove struct sync_pt
> > >   staging/android: remove unused var from sync_timeline_signal()
> > >   staging/android: remove pointless sync_timeline_signal at destroy
> > >     phase
> > >   staging/android: remove sync_fence_create_dma()
> > >
> > For whole series:
> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Renaming sync_fence to sync_file makes sense, it should hopefully reduce confusion.
> 
> Poke. What is missing for this to go upstream? Do I need more review
> here? Thanks.

You just sent this, give me a chance to get to it, my staging patch
queue is over 1000 patches at the moment :(

greg k-h