Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtlwifi: Fix reusable codes in core.c

From: Larry Finger
Date: Wed Feb 03 2016 - 14:47:05 EST


On 02/02/2016 08:16 PM, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable.
So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.

Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim <quddnr145@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx>
---
V2 split in separate patchs.
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c | 28 ++++------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
index 05f432c..c1193d1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
@@ -63,18 +63,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_addr_delay);
void rtl_rfreg_delay(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath, u32 addr,
u32 mask, u32 data)
{
- if (addr == 0xfe) {
- mdelay(50);
- } else if (addr == 0xfd) {
- mdelay(5);
- } else if (addr == 0xfc) {
- mdelay(1);
- } else if (addr == 0xfb) {
- udelay(50);
- } else if (addr == 0xfa) {
- udelay(5);
- } else if (addr == 0xf9) {
- udelay(1);
+ if (addr >= 0xf9 && addr <= 0xfe) {
+ rtl_addr_delay(addr);
} else {
rtl_set_rfreg(hw, rfpath, addr, mask, data);
udelay(1);
@@ -84,18 +74,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_rfreg_delay);

void rtl_bb_delay(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 addr, u32 data)
{
- if (addr == 0xfe) {
- mdelay(50);
- } else if (addr == 0xfd) {
- mdelay(5);
- } else if (addr == 0xfc) {
- mdelay(1);
- } else if (addr == 0xfb) {
- udelay(50);
- } else if (addr == 0xfa) {
- udelay(5);
- } else if (addr == 0xf9) {
- udelay(1);
+ if (addr >= 0xf9 && addr <= 0xfe) {
+ rtl_addr_delay(addr);
} else {
rtl_set_bbreg(hw, addr, MASKDWORD, data);
udelay(1);


Unlike patch 1 of 2, this one makes changes that are good. Thus

Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Larry