Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds

From: Keerthy
Date: Sun Feb 14 2016 - 23:30:27 EST




On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [160212 14:32]:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [160209 14:17]:
On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
Correcting the thresholds for the same.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
---

Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90

arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
+++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530

Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?

we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.

Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
cycle?

personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.

OK let's wait for that then.

OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.


Regards,

Tony