Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison
From: Andrey Ryabinin
Date: Fri Feb 26 2016 - 09:01:14 EST
On 02/18/2016 08:27 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> This patch is a followup to the discussion in .
> When using KASAN and CPU idle and/or CPU hotplug, KASAN leaves the stack shadow
> poisoned on exit from the kernel, and this poison is later hit when a CPU is
> brought online and reuses that portion of the stack. Hitting the poison depends
> on stackframe layout, so the bug only manifests in some configurations.
> I think that the hotplug issue is generic, and x86 is affected. I couldn't spot
> magic around idle, so x86 may be fine there. It would be great if someone
> familiar with the x86 code could prove/disprove either of those assertions.
> If x86 is affected, it likely makes sense to unpoison the stack in common code
> prior to bringing a CPU online to avoid that.
I think x86 need that unpoisoning. do_boot_cpu() resets stack for secondary cpu,
so it could be possible to hit stale shadow.
static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
idle->thread.sp = (unsigned long) (((struct pt_regs *)
(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(idle))) - 1);
early_gdt_descr.address = (unsigned long)get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu);
initial_code = (unsigned long)start_secondary;
stack_start = idle->thread.sp;
> For idle I'm not keen on having to perform a memset of THREAD_SIZE/8 every time
> a CPU re-enters the kernel. I don't yet have numbers for how bad that is, but
> it doesn't sound good.
>  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/408961.html