Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Additional kmsg devices

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Sat Feb 27 2016 - 06:54:22 EST


On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Could you explain in more detail what did you mean by IPC problems?
> I guess that the idea was to make IPC more effective in general.
> You definitely could not move all functionality that needs IPC
> into the kernel.

1. There are multiple ways to do IPC and I don't think what was
implemented as the comparison is optimal.

2. If that were optimal, we have an a lot larger general IPC problem
than logging. We can't possibly implement custom solution for each
specific IPC use case in kernel.