Re: [PATCH 0/3] video/fbdev: avoid module usage in non-modular sparc code,Re: [PATCH 0/3] video/fbdev: avoid module usage in non-modular sparc code
From: Tomi Valkeinen
Date: Mon Feb 29 2016 - 03:51:41 EST
On 26/02/16 19:21, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:58:00 +0200
>> While doing this, did you just go forward removing the module support,
>> or did you check if it would be trivial to make the driver build as a
>> module? I wouldn't be surprised if in some cases all that would need to
>> be done is change the Kconfig's bool to tristate.
> I think what he is doing is reasonable, and none of these sparc drivers
> have any reason to be built modular. You need them to have any bootup
> console whatsoever, so they have to be built in statically to be
> usable at all.
I disagree. Having drivers buildable as modules is always good, even if
the normal use case would be to have them as built-in.
> I plan to apply this patch series to my sparc tree as-is.
They are fbdev patches without any dependency to sparc afaics. So let's
apply them via fbdev tree.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature