Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/80] 3.10.99-stable review

From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Wed Mar 02 2016 - 10:49:30 EST


On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:32:15AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 03:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.99 release.
> >There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Thu Mar 3 23:43:32 UTC 2016.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 122 pass: 119 fail: 3
> Failed builds:
> arm:allmodconfig
> mn10300:asb2303_defconfig
> mn10300:asb2364_defconfig
>
> Qemu test results:
> total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0
>
> arm:allmodconfig fails with:
>
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label
> "clksdhc"
>
> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/wm8650-mid.dtb] Error 2
>
> which is due to 'dts: vt8500: Add SDHC node to DTS file for WM8650'.
>
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Indeed, clksdhc was added in 3.11 by the following patch :

9e7b6d3 ("dts: vt8500: Add ARM, AHB, APB and DDR clock nodes to SoC files")

3 other patches are missing in this DTSI file compared to 3.14, so I guess
this patch should simply be dropped from 3.10.

Willy