Re: [PATCH] usbhid: Fix lockdep unannotated irqs-off warning

[Jiri Kosina]

On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> Did someone look at the next/follow-ups in this thread?
> For example: D6629 "x86: Emit LAHF/SAHF instead of PUSHF/POPF" [2]?

Using LAHF/SAHF would "solve" it, as IF is at bit #9. The question is 
whether they need to play with flags here at all.

On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> So, if Clang is producing wrong X86 code here, is it possible to turn 
> interrupts on/off manually? But, hmm that affects other places as well 
> in the Linux sources, so.

This issue needs to be handled in the compiler.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs