Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

[Lee Jones]

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Kieran Bingham wrote:

> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On 9 October 2015 at 22:16, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As said to Kieran personally in Dublin, I want a verification that all
> > binding methods still work, especially runtime instantiation for drivers
> > without i2c_device_ids.
> 
> Ok, I should be able to find some time to look at that this week.
> 
> >  Also, for the last patch, a verification should
> > be done if the drivers i2c_device_id hasn't been used meanwhile.
> 
> I'll see what I can do ...
> 
> > I'd also like to see 'probe_new' instead of 'probe2' for the new function
> > name. That should be it.
> 
> Ok, obviously this is only a temporary naming so I don't mind either way,
> I'll do a rename for the next version
> 
> I've also just found a compile failure to fix up on !CONFIG_OF, this
> can make its way into the respin.

I still don't see this upstream.  What's the latest status?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog