Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

From: Russel Winder
Date: Mon Mar 07 2016 - 23:53:36 EST


On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 09:46 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> [â]
> If we're talking about the same asciidoctor (http://asciidoctor.org/)
> it's written in ruby but you can apparently run it in JVM using
> JRuby. Calling it Java-based is misleading.

Indeed, I was somewhat imprecise. Thanks to the work mostly of Charles
Nutter, JRuby is invariably a faster platform for Ruby code than Ruby
is. So yes ASCIIDoctor is JVM-based via JRuby, not Java-based.

The real point here is that in a move from DocBook/XML as a
documentation source, ASCIIDoctor is an excellent choice.

--ÂRussel.=============================================================================Dr Russel WinderÂÂÂÂÂÂt: +44 20 7585 2200ÂÂÂvoip: sip:russel.winder@xxxxxxxxxxx Buckmaster RoadÂÂÂÂm: +44 7770 465 077ÂÂÂxmpp: russel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SW11 1EN, UKÂÂÂw: www.russel.org.ukÂÂskype: russel_winder

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part