Re: [RFC 5/7] wlcore: avoid fragile snprintf use
From: Kalle Valo
Date: Wed Mar 09 2016 - 06:49:29 EST
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Appending to a buffer like this is not guaranteed to work (passing
> overlapping src and dst buffers to snprintf is undefined
> behaviour). The standard and safe idiom is to keep track of the
> current string length.
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Should I take this or what's the plan?