Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next

[Måns Rullgård]

Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, MÃns RullgÃrd <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not very surprising either.  The number of people using Linux on avr32
>>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still
>>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts.
>>>
>>>
>>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like
>>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a
>>> burden on many drivers.
>>>
>> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat
>> the h8300 experience.
>
> So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle?
>
> P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "ârelocation truncated to fit:
> R_AVR32_21Sâ", though I can test anything anyone propose.

I'd like to try fixing it before we delete anything.  At the very least,
it's always a good idea to figure out exactly why it broke, just to be
sure it isn't a broader issue that has yet to manifest itself elsewhere.

-- 
MÃns RullgÃrd