Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update
From: Thierry Reding
Date: Thu Mar 10 2016 - 12:55:06 EST
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:34:19AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So just to summarize:
> > * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args().
> > pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't
> > support readout.
> > * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions)
> > atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread.
> > * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated.
> > * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support
> > hardware readout.
> > * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23).
> > * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't
> > support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time.
> > Did I get all that right? Thanks!
> Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't
> understand"? That will unblock Boris, I think.
Sounds about right. Hopefully this will eliminate any objections that
others had about the series.
Description: PGP signature