Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix typo in babble endpoint handling comment

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Fri Mar 11 2016 - 01:55:35 EST


Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@xxxxxxx> writes:

> [ text/plain ]
> The 0.95 xHCI spec says that non-control endpoints will be halted if a
> babble is detected on a transfer. The 0.96 xHCI spec says all types of
> endpoints will be halted when a babble is detected. Some hardware that
> claims to be 0.95 compliant halts the control endpoint anyway.
>
> Reference: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg21755.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index 3915657..59841a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static int xhci_requires_manual_halt_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> if (trb_comp_code == COMP_TX_ERR ||
> trb_comp_code == COMP_BABBLE ||
> trb_comp_code == COMP_SPLIT_ERR)
> - /* The 0.96 spec says a babbling control endpoint
> + /* The 0.95 spec says a babbling control endpoint
> * is not halted. The 0.96 spec says it is. Some HW
> * claims to be 0.95 compliant, but it halts the control
> * endpoint anyway. Check if a babble halted the
> --
> 2.6.2.198.g614a2ac
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature