Re: [PATCH v3] dell-rbtn: Ignore ACPI notifications if device is suspended

From: Gabriele Mazzotta
Date: Mon Mar 21 2016 - 11:13:42 EST


2016-03-21 13:17 GMT+01:00 Pali RohÃr <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 23:44:23 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE rbtn_acpi_clear_flag(void *context)
>> +{
>> + struct rbtn_data *rbtn_data = context;
>> +
>> + rbtn_data->suspended = false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rbtn_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_device *device = to_acpi_device(dev);
>> + struct rbtn_data *rbtn_data = acpi_driver_data(device);
>> +
>> + rbtn_data->suspended = true;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rbtn_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_device *device = to_acpi_device(dev);
>> + struct rbtn_data *rbtn_data = acpi_driver_data(device);
>> + acpi_status status;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Clear the flag only after we received the extra
>> + * ACPI notification.
>> + */
>> + status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER,
>> + rbtn_acpi_clear_flag, rbtn_data);
>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> + rbtn_data->suspended = false;
>
> I case when acpi_os_execute success it calls rbtn_acpi_clear_flag,
> right? And that will set suspended to false. When acpi_os_execute fails,
> then it set suspended too to false... Then whole acpi_os_execute doing
> just "barrier" after which suspended flag can be set to false. So I
> think rbtn_acpi_clear_flag function is not needed here.
>
> Cannot you pass NULL or empty function pointer as callback? Or what was
> reason to do that flag clearing at "two places"?

acpi_os_execute doesn't wait for the callback to be executed, so
I can't clear the flag from rbtn_resume.

>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> --
> Pali RohÃr
> pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx