Re: N900 sleep mode (in 4.5-rc0, if that matters)
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Wed Mar 23 2016 - 10:37:24 EST
On Wed 2016-02-10 17:08:18, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [160209 09:26]:
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> [160207 13:24]:
> > > ffdffebd 48004a20 (fa004a20) cm_idlest1_core blocking bits: 00200042
> > > 0000000d 48004a28 (fa004a28) cm_idlest3_core
> > Bit 21 in cm_idlest1_core is for MCSPI4 so WLAN. Does that go
> > down if do sleep 5; cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_debug/count ?
> > If not, the're PM runtime missing or broken somewhere.
> Just tested n900 wlan here and it's working for me with Emil's
> patch from the "" thread and the PM runtime regression fix for
> hsmmc I posted earlier today. Looks like n900 is hitting off
> mode just fine with wlan0 configured.
Emil's patch, would that be:
Author: Emil Goode <emil.fsw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Feb 10 02:22:16 2016 +0100
wlcore: Fix regression in wlcore_set_partition()
The commit 3719c17e1816 ("wlcore/wl18xx: fw logger over sdio")
regression causing the wlcore to time out and go into
recovery. Reverting the
changes regarding write of the last partition size brings the
module back to
it's functional state.
Fixes: 3719c17e1816 ("wlcore/wl18xx: fw logger over sdio")
Hsmmc regression, that's
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:02:44 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix PM regression with deferred probe for pm_runtime_reinit
? Aha, but the patch this regression fixes does not seem to be in 4.4,
so I should be fine unless I go to 4.5.
> It does not wake up to pings from outside from off mode though
> until the system wakes up.
Ok, I guess I'm trying to get it to sleep, first, then we can talk
about wakeup ;-).
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html