Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: ignore GpioInt() GPIOs when requesting GPIO_OUT_*

From: Mika Westerberg
Date: Thu Mar 24 2016 - 10:01:50 EST


On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:58:31PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When firmware does not use _DSD properties that allow properly name GPIO
> resources, the kernel falls back on parsing _CRS resources, and will
> return entries described as GpioInt() as general purpose GPIOs even
> though they are meant to be used simply as interrupt sources for the
> device:
>
> Device (ETSA)
> {
> Name (_HID, "ELAN0001")
> ...
>
> Method(_CRS, 0x0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Name(BUF0,ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> I2CSerialBus(
> 0x10, /* SlaveAddress */
> ControllerInitiated, /* SlaveMode */
> 400000, /* ConnectionSpeed */
> AddressingMode7Bit, /* AddressingMode */
> "\\_SB.I2C1", /* ResourceSource */
> )
> GpioInt (Edge, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone,,
> "\\_SB.GPSW") { BOARD_TOUCH_GPIO_INDEX }
> } )
> Return (BUF0)
> }
> ...
> }
>
> This gives troubles with drivers such as Elan Touchscreen driver
> (elants_i2c) that uses devm_gpio_get to look up "reset" GPIO line and
> decide whether the driver is responsible for powering up and resetting
> the device or firmware is. In the above case the lookup succeeds, we map
> GPIO as output and later fail to request client->irq interrupt that is
> mapped to the same GPIO.
>
> Let's ignore resources described as GpioInt() when requesting output
> GPIO (but allow them when requesting GPIOD_ASIS or GPIOD_IN as some
> drivers - i2c-hid - do request GPIO as input and then map it to
> interrupt with gpiod_to_irq).

You could mention here that we only ignore GpioInt() resources in
fallback case.

> BUG=chrome-os-partner:51154
> TEST=Boot Cyan, verify touchscreen work
>
> Change-Id: Id20c730b937dce8a4135d2b64c8d798372d20e82

This is not needed for mainline patches :)

> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>