Re: [PATCH v2] parport: register driver later

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A bit better commit message here would have caused me to notice it.
> Something like "Revert a broken patch because it crashes all of our
> machines without it!!!" would be a hint it needed to go in :)

Didn't my revert of e7223f1860 fix this?

> I think the lack of parport hardware around seems to have caused a total
> lack of testing this code path while it was in linux-next and in my
> local testing, sorry about that, it should have been caught a lot
> earlier.

Well, the original 0day kernel test robot report was from the
linux-next days, back in February. I reverted the commit that the
kernel test robot indicated was the point where the actual trouble
started two weeks ago (commit 1701f680407c).

I was hoping that would be it. Have there been reports since that I
haven't seen?

                Linus