Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Rearrange cpufreq_add_dev()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Apr 07 2016 - 00:30:20 EST


On 07-04-16, 03:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reorganize the code in cpufreq_add_dev() to avoid using the ret
> variable and reduce the indentation level in it.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1311,26 +1311,24 @@ out_free_policy:
> */
> static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
> {
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> unsigned cpu = dev->id;
> - int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: adding CPU%u\n", __func__, cpu);
>
> - if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
> - ret = cpufreq_online(cpu);
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * A hotplug notifier will follow and we will handle it as CPU
> - * online then. For now, just create the sysfs link, unless
> - * there is no policy or the link is already present.
> - */
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> + if (cpu_online(cpu))
> + return cpufreq_online(cpu);
>
> - ret = policy && !cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus)
> - ? add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu) : 0;
> - }
> + /*
> + * A hotplug notifier will follow and we will handle it as CPU online
> + * then. For now, just create the sysfs link, unless there is no policy
> + * or the link is already present.
> + */
> + policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> + if (!policy || cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus))
> + return 0;
>
> - return ret;
> + return add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu);
> }
>
> static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
viresh