Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

From: Lee Jones
Date: Mon Apr 11 2016 - 10:06:26 EST


On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> >>
> >> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
> >> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
> >> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
> >> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
> >> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
> >> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
> >> >
> >> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
> >> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
> >> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
> >> > property_set.
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> > arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 12 ++++--------
> >
> > Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
> >
> > Otherwise I think we are covered.
> >
> >> > arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c | 6 +-----
> >> > drivers/base/platform.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >> > drivers/base/property.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 12 ++----------
> >> > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c | 20 ++++----------------
> >> > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 2 +-
> >> > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h | 4 ++--
> >> > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 4 ++--
> >> > include/linux/mfd/core.h | 4 ++--
> >> > include/linux/platform_device.h | 6 +++---
> >> > include/linux/property.h | 15 +++------------
> >> > 12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> What's happening with this patch? I believe we're still missing
> >> Acks. Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
> >> branch and send out a pull-request.
> >
> > Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?
>
> Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now. I'm planning to move it to
> linux-next this week

Please ensure you send out the relevant pull-requests. Linus doesn't
look his best when he's angry.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog