Re: [LKP] [lkp] [parallel lookups machinery, part 2] 96352435af: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2599!

From: Al Viro
Date: Sun Apr 17 2016 - 22:15:14 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask."
Previous message: Josh Triplett: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask."
In reply to: Huang\, Ying: "Re: [LKP] [lkp] [parallel lookups machinery, part 2] 96352435af: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2599!"
Next in thread: Huang\, Ying: "Re: [LKP] [lkp] [parallel lookups machinery, part 2] 96352435af: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2599!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:08:37AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:

> Could you provide a debug branch in your tree for that?

Done - vfs.git#T1 and vfs.git#T2 resp.

How reproducible it is and how certain you are that it's not there on
the parent commit?

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask."
Previous message: Josh Triplett: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask."
In reply to: Huang\, Ying: "Re: [LKP] [lkp] [parallel lookups machinery, part 2] 96352435af: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2599!"
Next in thread: Huang\, Ying: "Re: [LKP] [lkp] [parallel lookups machinery, part 2] 96352435af: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2599!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]