Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: reserved binding rb-tree and helpers

From: Eric Auger
Date: Wed Apr 20 2016 - 12:20:53 EST


Robin,
On 04/20/2016 03:12 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
>> we will need to track which host physical addresses are mapped to
>> reserved IOVA. In that prospect we introduce a new RB tree indexed
>> by physical address. This RB tree only is used for reserved IOVA
>> bindings.
>>
>> It is expected this RB tree will contain very few bindings.
>
> Sounds like a good reason in favour of using a list, and thus having
> rather less code here ;)

OK will move to a simple list.
>
>> Those
>> generally correspond to single page mapping one MSI frame (GICv2m
>> frame or ITS GITS_TRANSLATER frame).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> v5 -> v6:
>> - add comment about @d->reserved_lock to be held
>>
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - that code was formerly in "iommu/arm-smmu: add a reserved binding RB
>> tree"
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c | 63
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> index 2562af0..f6fa18e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,69 @@ struct reserved_iova_domain {
>> int prot; /* iommu protection attributes to be obeyed */
>> };
>>
>> +struct iommu_reserved_binding {
>> + struct kref kref;
>> + struct rb_node node;
>> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
>
> Hang on, the tree these are in is already embedded in a domain. Ergo we
> can't look them up without first knowing the domain they belong to, so
> what purpose does this guy serve?
this is used on the kref_put. The release function takes a kref; then we
get the container to retrieve the binding and storing the domain here
enables to unlink the node.

Best Regards

Eric
>
> Robin.
>
>> + phys_addr_t addr;
>> + dma_addr_t iova;
>> + size_t size;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Reserved binding RB-tree manipulation */
>> +
>> +/* @d->reserved_lock must be held */
>> +static struct iommu_reserved_binding *find_reserved_binding(
>> + struct iommu_domain *d,
>> + phys_addr_t start, size_t size)
>> +{
>> + struct rb_node *node = d->reserved_binding_list.rb_node;
>> +
>> + while (node) {
>> + struct iommu_reserved_binding *binding =
>> + rb_entry(node, struct iommu_reserved_binding, node);
>> +
>> + if (start + size <= binding->addr)
>> + node = node->rb_left;
>> + else if (start >= binding->addr + binding->size)
>> + node = node->rb_right;
>> + else
>> + return binding;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* @d->reserved_lock must be held */
>> +static void link_reserved_binding(struct iommu_domain *d,
>> + struct iommu_reserved_binding *new)
>> +{
>> + struct rb_node **link = &d->reserved_binding_list.rb_node;
>> + struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
>> + struct iommu_reserved_binding *binding;
>> +
>> + while (*link) {
>> + parent = *link;
>> + binding = rb_entry(parent, struct iommu_reserved_binding,
>> + node);
>> +
>> + if (new->addr + new->size <= binding->addr)
>> + link = &(*link)->rb_left;
>> + else
>> + link = &(*link)->rb_right;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rb_link_node(&new->node, parent, link);
>> + rb_insert_color(&new->node, &d->reserved_binding_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* @d->reserved_lock must be held */
>> +static void unlink_reserved_binding(struct iommu_domain *d,
>> + struct iommu_reserved_binding *old)
>> +{
>> + rb_erase(&old->node, &d->reserved_binding_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> int iommu_alloc_reserved_iova_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> dma_addr_t iova, size_t size, int prot,
>> unsigned long order)
>>
>