Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup

[Cao jin]

On 04/21/2016 09:23 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800
> Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer
> > > wanted to say here.
> > *it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions
> > of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way*
> >
> > equals
> >
> > *it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think.
> >
> > So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in
> > an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong?
>
> The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being
> unacceptable.  It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be
> made.

Thanks, will remove the change in v2

--
Yours Sincerely,

Cao jin