Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable

From: Lianwei Wang
Date: Thu Apr 28 2016 - 02:11:01 EST


On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Lianwei Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Anyway, from a product perspective way, if we don't want to restore
>> >> the unbalanced counter to 0, then maybe a BUG_ON is more reasonable
>> >> than WARN_ON.
>> >
>> > Not at all. BUG_ON is the last resort if we have no other way to handle an
>> > issue.
>> Actually to the customer, you do nothing currently at all, and once it
>> happened then there is no way for the customer to recover it except do
>> a power cycle. A BUG_ON can trigger a power cycle and recover it.
>
> Do you have a single incident where this happened?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx

Yes. In our project, there is a kernel driver which register a pm
notifier. On some conditions this pm notifier will return an error and
abort the suspend process. The counter will be unbalanced in case it
happened.