Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] Shared library support

From: Emese Revfy
Date: Tue May 03 2016 - 17:18:20 EST


On Mon, 2 May 2016 14:03:00 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

> > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.clean b/scripts/Makefile.clean
> > index 55c96cb..e4e88ab 100644
> > --- a/scripts/Makefile.clean
> > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.clean
> > @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ subdir-ymn := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(subdir-ymn))
> > __clean-files := $(extra-y) $(extra-m) $(extra-) \
> > $(always) $(targets) $(clean-files) \
> > $(host-progs) \
> > - $(hostprogs-y) $(hostprogs-m) $(hostprogs-)
> > + $(hostprogs-y) $(hostprogs-m) $(hostprogs-) \
> > + $(hostlibs-y) $(hostlibs-m) $(hostlibs-)
>
> $(hostcxxlibs-y)$(hostcxxlibs-m) is missing here.
>
>
> BTW, are you planning to support hostlibs without .so extention in the future?
>
>
> You are changing the top Makefile to clean with "*.so" pattern rule.
>
> Do you need to change both the top Makefile and Makefile.clean
> for belt-and-braces cleaning?

It doesn't delete the *.so files without the hunk from the top Makefile.
The mrproper and distclean targets remove them with this patch:
https://github.com/ephox-gcc-plugins/gcc-plugins_linux-next/commit/f23b7eb247ccc9f1007e53313af343980dd52591
But I think this isn't the best solution much like doing it from the top Makefile.

--
Emese