Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.

[Robert Foss]

On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
> > -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
> > update pending.
> >
> > Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
> >
> >      *  - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
> >      *    an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
> >      *    of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
> >      *    Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
> >      *    synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
> >      *    commit in that case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This looks good to me.  Let's give it a few days on the list for any
> other KMS folks to catch anything.

I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch.
Does anyone have objections to it being merged?