Re: [PATCH 2/4] phy: rockchip-emmc: configure frequency range and drive impedance

From: Brian Norris
Date: Fri May 13 2016 - 17:04:49 EST


On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:46:33AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2016/5/13 6:43, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> @@ -154,6 +167,20 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy
> >> *phy)
> >> struct rockchip_emmc_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >> int ret = 0;
> >>
> >> + /* DLL operation: 170 to 200 MHz */
> >
> >
> > What is 170 here? Should we expose them to dt instead of hardcoding
> > them?
>
> This was probably my fault. I did some searching and found
> <https://arasan.com/wp-content/media/eMMC-5-1-Total-Solution_Rev-1-3.pdf>.
> It appears to be docs for a similar (but not identical) PHY. We were
> looking at it to try to get more clarity on some bits that were hard
> to understand in the docs we had.
>
> In that doc there appear to be 3 bits for selecting the DLL operation
> and they have ranges defined. In Rockchip's PHY there are only 2
> bits. Thus things don't map totally properly.
>
> Anyway, comment should probably be removed.

[...]

> So overall:
>
> * Should re-spin and remove the comment about 170 MHz.
>
> * I think this could land as-is other than the comment.

Right, will fix the first bullet point.

Brian