Re: [PATCH V7 04/11] pci: Add new function to unmap IO resources.

From: Jayachandran C
Date: Mon May 23 2016 - 04:29:22 EST


On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is very useful to release I/O resources so that the same I/O resources
> can be allocated again (pci_remap_iospace), like in PCI hotplug removal
> scenario. Therefore this patch implements new pci_unmap_iospace call which
> unmaps I/O space as the symmetry to pci_remap_iospace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index bc0c914..ff97a0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> #include <linux/aer.h>
> #include "pci.h"
> @@ -3167,6 +3168,29 @@ int __weak pci_remap_iospace(const struct resource *res, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
> #endif
> }
>
> +/**
> + * pci_unmap_iospace - Unmap the memory mapped I/O space
> + * @res: resource to be unmapped
> + *
> + * Unmap the CPU virtual address @res from virtual address space.
> + * Only architectures that have memory mapped IO functions defined
> + * (and the PCI_IOBASE value defined) should call this function.
> + */
> +void pci_unmap_iospace(struct resource *res)
> +{
> +#if defined(PCI_IOBASE) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
> + unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long)PCI_IOBASE + res->start;
> +
> + unmap_kernel_range(vaddr, resource_size(res));
> +#else
> + /*
> + * This architecture does not have memory mapped I/O space,
> + * so this function should never be called.
> + */
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "This architecture does not support memory mapped I/O\n");
> +#endif
> +}

WARN is not needed here, since we would have already done it in
pci_remap_iospace.

Ideally, we should undo the pci_register_io_range as well, but
re-registering the same range seems to be fine.

JC.