Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu/rockchip: add ARM64 cache flush operation for iommu

From: Shunqian Zheng
Date: Mon May 23 2016 - 22:34:00 EST


Catalin, Robin,

On 2016å05æ23æ 21:35, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:44:14AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 23/05/16 02:37, Shunqian Zheng wrote:
From: Simon <xxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Simon <xxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index 043d18c..1741b65 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -95,12 +95,16 @@ struct rk_iommu {

static inline void rk_table_flush(u32 *va, unsigned int count)
{
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
phys_addr_t pa_start = virt_to_phys(va);
phys_addr_t pa_end = virt_to_phys(va + count);
size_t size = pa_end - pa_start;

__cpuc_flush_dcache_area(va, size);
outer_flush_range(pa_start, pa_end);
+#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
+ __dma_flush_range(va, va + count);
+#endif
Ugh, please don't use arch-private cache maintenance functions directly from
a driver. Allocating/mapping page tables to be read by the IOMMU is still
DMA, so using the DMA APIs is the correct way to manage them, *especially*
if it needs to work across multiple architectures.
It's easier for us if changing the __dma_flush_range() to __flush_dcache_area() is acceptable here?

Thank you,
- shunqian
I fully agree, these functions should not be used in drivers.