[PATCH 05/11] cpufreq: elanfreq: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 - 10:22:28 EST
Later patches would make changes in cpufreq core, after which
policy->freq_table may be reordered by cpufreq core and it wouldn't be
safe anymore to use 'index' for any other local arrays.
To prepare for that, use policy->freq_table[index].driver_data for other
driver specific usage of 'index'. The 'driver_data' fields are already
set properly by the driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
index bfce11cba1df..bd4a51091986 100644
@@ -108,9 +108,15 @@ static unsigned int elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int elanfreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int state)
+ unsigned int index)
+ * policy->freq_table may be sorted differently, get the index value we
+ * are concerned about.
+ unsigned int state = policy->freq_table[index].driver_data;
* Access to the Elan's internal registers is indexed via
* 0x22: Chip Setup & Control Register Index Register (CSCI)
* 0x23: Chip Setup & Control Register Data Register (CSCD)