Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] trace: Duplicate the output of the function trace logs to STM

[Chunyan Zhang]

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> This patch adds an output from Ftrace to STM.
>
> But does it?
>
>> That being said,
>> Function trace messages would also be duplicated to STM buffer when
>> being stored into ring buffer.
>
> Not sure what you mean here. What's "STM buffer"?

Sorry if this is ambiguously expression, I mean the buffer which
stores the trace data from STM, such as ETB/TMC for CoreSight.

>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> index 8a4bd6b..d613053 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>
>>  #include "trace.h"
>>  #include "trace_output.h"
>> +#include "trace_output_stm.h"
>>
>>  /*
>>   * On boot up, the ring buffer is set to the minimum size, so that
>> @@ -1884,8 +1885,10 @@ trace_function(struct trace_array *tr,
>>       entry->ip                       = ip;
>>       entry->parent_ip                = parent_ip;
>>
>> -     if (!call_filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
>> +     if (!call_filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event)) {
>>               __buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
>> +             ftrace_stm_func(ip, parent_ip);
>> +     }
>
> So this logs instruction pointers, not the actual events. Not much is
> duplicated like the message suggests, but it also doesn't seem very
> useful.

Yes, only knowing function pointers may not be very useful, if doing
in this way is acceptable I intend to add more interfaces to export
more information to STM in the feature, I will appreciate if you can
tell me what information you think is _absolutely_ necessary.

Thanks,
Chunyan

>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex