Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] mfd: arizona: Check if AOD interrupts are pending before dispatching

From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Jun 15 2016 - 08:51:12 EST


On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:

> Previously the arizona_irq_thread implementation would call
> handle_nested_irqs() to handle AOD interrupts without checking if any
> were actually pending. The kernel will see these as spurious IRQs and
> will eventually disable the IRQ.
>
> This patch ensures we only launch the nested handler if there are AOD
> interrupts pending in the codec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Trimmer <simont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c
> index edeb495..5e18d3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c
> @@ -109,8 +109,20 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> do {
> poll = false;
>
> - if (arizona->aod_irq_chip)
> - handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(arizona->virq, 0));
> + if (arizona->aod_irq_chip) {
> + /*
> + * Check the AOD status register to determine whether
> + * the nested IRQ handler should be called.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap,
> + ARIZONA_AOD_IRQ1, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(arizona->dev,
> + "Failed to read AOD IRQ1 %d\n", ret);
> + else if (val)
> + handle_nested_irq(
> + irq_find_mapping(arizona->virq, 0));
> + }
>
> /*
> * Check if one of the main interrupts is asserted and only

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog