Re: [V2, next] brcmfmac: don't remove interface on link down firmware event

[Kalle Valo]

RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
> There are two firmware events we handle similarly in brcmfmac:
> BRCMF_E_LINK and BRCMF_E_IF. The difference from firmware point of view
> is that the first one means BSS remains present in the firmware. Trying
> to (re)create it (e.g. when adding new virtual interface) will result in
> an error.
> 
> Current code treats both events in a similar way. It removes Linux
> interface for each of them. It works OK with e.g. BCM43602. Its firmware
> generates both events for each interface. It means we get BRCMF_E_LINK
> and remove interface. That is soon followed by BRCMF_E_IF which means
> BSS was also removed in a firmware. The only downside of this is a
> harmless error like:
> [  208.643180] brcmfmac: brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler: no interface object
> 
> Unfortunately BCM4366 firmware doesn't automatically remove BSS and so
> it doesn't generate BRCMF_E_IF. In such case we incorrectly remove Linux
> interface on BRCMF_E_LINK as BSS is still present in the firmware. It
> results in an error when trying to re-create virtual interface, e.g.:
> > iw phy phy1 interface add wlan1-1 type __ap
> [ 3602.929199] brcmfmac: brcmf_ap_add_vif: timeout occurred
> command failed: I/O error (-5)
> 
> With this patch we don't remove Linux interface while firmware keeps
> BSS. Thanks to this we keep a consistent states of host driver and
> device firmware.
> 
> Further improvement should be to mark BSS as disabled and remove
> interface on BRCMF_E_LINK. Then we should add support for reusing
> BSS-es.
> 
> Signed-off-by: RafaÅ MiÅecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, 1 patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git:

fd3667a8d1cb brcmfmac: don't remove interface on link down firmware event

-- 
Sent by pwcli
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9140237/