Re: [PATCH] wlcore: time sync : add support for 64 bit clock

From: Johannes Berg
Date: Thu Jun 23 2016 - 07:36:07 EST

Next message: Matt Fleming: "[PATCH 09/11] efi/runtime-map: Use efi.memmap directly instead of a copy"
Previous message: Matt Fleming: "[PATCH 11/11] x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid copying image data"
In reply to: Machani, Yaniv: "RE: [PATCH] wlcore: time sync : add support for 64 bit clock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > Additionally, this looks like it changes the firmware API, so thatÂ
> > older firmware images will no longer work?
>
> It is backwards compatible,Â
> although it changes a API structure, older firmware are using only
> u16 for the field so there is no impact on that.
>

Oh, ok. I had also thought that the size changed, but missed that you
replaced a u32 with two u16. Thanks for checking :)

johannes

Next message: Matt Fleming: "[PATCH 09/11] efi/runtime-map: Use efi.memmap directly instead of a copy"
Previous message: Matt Fleming: "[PATCH 11/11] x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid copying image data"
In reply to: Machani, Yaniv: "RE: [PATCH] wlcore: time sync : add support for 64 bit clock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]