Re: [RFC PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/fb/nv50: set DMA mask before mapping scratch page

From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Tue Jun 28 2016 - 10:05:44 EST


On 21 June 2016 at 14:50, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The 100c08 scratch page is mapped using dma_map_page() before the TTM
> layer has had a chance to set the DMA mask. This means we are still
> running with the default of 32 when this code executes, and this causes
> problems for platforms with no memory below 4 GB (such as AMD Seattle)
>
> So move the dma_map_page() to the .init hook, and set the streaming DMA
> mask based on the MMU subdev parameters before performing the call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> I am sure there is a much better way to address this, but this fixes the
> problem I get on AMD Seattle with a GeForce 210 PCIe card:
>
> nouveau 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> nouveau 0000:02:00.0: NVIDIA GT218 (0a8280b1)
> nouveau 0000:02:00.0: bios: version 70.18.a6.00.00
> nouveau 0000:02:00.0: fb ctor failed, -14
> nouveau: probe of 0000:02:00.0 failed with error -14
>
> v2: replace incorrect comparison of dma_addr_t type var against NULL
>

Ping?


> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/nv50.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/nv50.c
> index 1b5fb02eab2a..033ca0effb7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/nv50.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/nv50.c
> @@ -216,11 +216,30 @@ nv50_fb_init(struct nvkm_fb *base)
> struct nv50_fb *fb = nv50_fb(base);
> struct nvkm_device *device = fb->base.subdev.device;
>
> + if (!fb->r100c08) {
> + /*
> + * We are calling the DMA api way before the TTM layer sets the
> + * DMA mask based on the MMU subdev parameters. This means we
> + * are using the default DMA mask of 32, which may cause
> + * problems on systems with no RAM below the 4 GB mark. So set
> + * the streaming DMA mask here as well.
> + */
> + dma_set_mask(device->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(device->mmu->dma_bits));
> +
> + fb->r100c08 = dma_map_page(device->dev, fb->r100c08_page, 0,
> + PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(device->dev, fb->r100c08)) {
> + nvkm_warn(&fb->base.subdev,
> + "dma_map_page() failed on 100c08 page\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Not a clue what this is exactly. Without pointing it at a
> * scratch page, VRAM->GART blits with M2MF (as in DDX DFS)
> * cause IOMMU "read from address 0" errors (rh#561267)
> */
> - nvkm_wr32(device, 0x100c08, fb->r100c08 >> 8);
> + if (fb->r100c08 != DMA_ERROR_CODE)
> + nvkm_wr32(device, 0x100c08, fb->r100c08 >> 8);
>
> /* This is needed to get meaningful information from 100c90
> * on traps. No idea what these values mean exactly. */
> @@ -233,11 +252,11 @@ nv50_fb_dtor(struct nvkm_fb *base)
> struct nv50_fb *fb = nv50_fb(base);
> struct nvkm_device *device = fb->base.subdev.device;
>
> - if (fb->r100c08_page) {
> + if (fb->r100c08 && fb->r100c08 != DMA_ERROR_CODE)
> dma_unmap_page(device->dev, fb->r100c08, PAGE_SIZE,
> DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> - __free_page(fb->r100c08_page);
> - }
> +
> + __free_page(fb->r100c08_page);
>
> return fb;
> }
> @@ -264,13 +283,9 @@ nv50_fb_new_(const struct nv50_fb_func *func, struct nvkm_device *device,
> *pfb = &fb->base;
>
> fb->r100c08_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> - if (fb->r100c08_page) {
> - fb->r100c08 = dma_map_page(device->dev, fb->r100c08_page, 0,
> - PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> - if (dma_mapping_error(device->dev, fb->r100c08))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - } else {
> - nvkm_warn(&fb->base.subdev, "failed 100c08 page alloc\n");
> + if (!fb->r100c08_page) {
> + nvkm_error(&fb->base.subdev, "failed 100c08 page alloc\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.7.4
>