[PATCH v2 07/15] [media] lirc_dev: simplify if statement in lirc_add_to_buf

From: Andi Shyti
Date: Fri Jul 01 2016 - 04:14:27 EST


The whole function is inside an 'if' statement
("if (ir->d.add_to_buf)").

Check the opposite of that statement at the beginning and exit,
this way we can have one level less of indentation.

Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
index da1777c..2468849 100644
--- a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
@@ -97,26 +97,25 @@ static void lirc_irctl_cleanup(struct irctl *ir)
*/
static int lirc_add_to_buf(struct irctl *ir)
{
- if (ir->d.add_to_buf) {
- int res = -ENODATA;
- int got_data = -1;
+ int res;
+ int got_data = -1;

- /*
- * service the device as long as it is returning
- * data and we have space
- */
- do {
- got_data++;
- res = ir->d.add_to_buf(ir->d.data, ir->buf);
- } while (!res);
+ if (!ir->d.add_to_buf)
+ return 0;

- if (res == -ENODEV)
- kthread_stop(ir->task);
+ /*
+ * service the device as long as it is returning
+ * data and we have space
+ */
+ do {
+ got_data++;
+ res = ir->d.add_to_buf(ir->d.data, ir->buf);
+ } while (!res);

- return got_data ? 0 : res;
- }
+ if (res == -ENODEV)
+ kthread_stop(ir->task);

- return 0;
+ return got_data ? 0 : res;
}

/* main function of the polling thread
--
2.8.1