Re: [RFC 0/3] extend kexec_file_load system call
From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Fri Jul 15 2016 - 09:42:41 EST
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:26:10AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:31:02AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I think that helps, as it makes the problem space correspond to that
> > of modifying the command line, but I can still come up with countless
> > attacks based on modifications of the /chosen node and/or the command
> > line, in fact it's probably easier than any other node.
> I don't know anything about DTB. So here comes a very basic question. Does
> DTB allow passing an executable blob to kernel or pass the location of
> some unsigned executable code at kernel level.
DT on ARM is a description of the hardware - it can be thought of as a
set of nodes with properties attached. The properties can describe
anything (we have documentation in Documentation/devicetree/bindings
which describes what we expect the properties to contain.)
On other architectures, DT can also contain open-firmware "functions"
but I don't think there's much support in the kernel for that - maybe
the PPC folk can reply on that point.
It is possible that someone may, at some point, decide to create a
property that points to some executable blob, but I can't think of a
reason why we should ever allow such a monstrosity in mainline kernels.
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.