Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: avoid unused function warnings
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Jul 26 2016 - 16:56:25 EST
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:18:53 PM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > index 2bb326bbc34a..593e34053c4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > @@ -1293,13 +1293,12 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > -static int sdhci_esdhc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +static int __maybe_unused sdhci_esdhc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> Instead of using __maybe_unused, I prefer to change above "#ifdef
> CONFIG_PMf" to "#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP".
> I do realize that the runtime PM callbacks still requires #ifdef
> CONFIG_PM, so yes that's requires an extra "ifdef".
> Sure, it's more a matter of taste (and micro optimizations).
I was hoping that we could eventually do a mass-conversion to
__maybe_unused, as everybody seems to get the #ifdef wrong.
Any specific reason for your preference?