Re: [PATCH] thermal: fix race condition when updating cooling device

From: Peter Feuerer
Date: Thu Aug 11 2016 - 17:50:52 EST


20. Juli 2016 11:46 Uhr, "Michele Di Giorgio" <michele.digiorgio@xxxxxxx> schrieb:
> When multiple thermal zones are bound to the same cooling device, multiple
> kernel threads may want to update the cooling device state by calling
> thermal_cdev_update(). Having cdev not protected by a mutex can lead to a race
> condition. Consider the following situation with two kernel threads k1 and k2:
>
> Thread k1 Thread k2
> ||
> || call thermal_cdev_update()
> || ...
> || set_cur_state(cdev, target);
> call power_actor_set_power() ||
> ... ||
> instance->target = state; ||
> cdev->updated = false; ||
> || cdev->updated = true;
> || // completes execution
> call thermal_cdev_update() ||
> // cdev->updated == true ||
> return; ||
> \/
> time
>
> k2 has already looped through the thermal instances looking for the deepest
> cooling device state and is preempted right before setting cdev->updated to
> true. Now, k1 runs, modifies the thermal instance state and sets cdev->updated
> to false. Then, k1 is preempted and k2 continues the execution by setting
> cdev->updated to true, therefore preventing k1 from performing the update.
> Notice that this is not an issue if k2 looks at the instance->target modified by
> k1 "after" it is assigned by k1. In fact, in this case the update will happen
> anyway and k1 can safely return immediately from thermal_cdev_update().
>
> This may lead to a situation where a thermal governor never updates the cooling
> device. For example, this is the case for the step_wise governor: when calling
> the function thermal_zone_trip_update(), the governor may always get a new state
> equal to the old one (which, however, wasn't notified to the cooling device) and
> will therefore skip the update.
>
> CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Peter Feuerer <peter@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Peter Feuerer <peter@xxxxxxxx>


> Reported-by: Toby Huang <toby.huang@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michele Di Giorgio <michele.digiorgio@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Protecting only the assignment of cdev->updated with mutexes may look
> suspicious, but it is necessary to guarantee synchronization and avoiding the
> situation described in the commit message.
>
> There are other two possible solutions.
>
> Moving the cdev->lock mutex outside thermal_cdev_update() and protect both the
> assignment and the function. This would work, but will probably cause many
> issues when updating all the modules that use thermal_cdev_update().
>
> The other solution is to make cdev->updated an atomic_t, change the if
> condition to an atomic_cmpxchg and extend the critical section to include the
> call to cdev->ops->set_cur_state().
>
> drivers/thermal/fair_share.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 2 ++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 10 +++++++---
> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c b/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
> index 34fe365..68bd1b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,9 @@ static int fair_share_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> instance->target = get_target_state(tz, cdev, percentage,
> cur_trip_level);
>
> + mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> instance->cdev->updated = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> thermal_cdev_update(cdev);
> }
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> index 70836c5..39d1519 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> dev_dbg(&instance->cdev->device, "target=%d\n",
> (int)instance->target);
>
> + mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> instance->cdev->updated = false; /* cdev needs update */
> + mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c
> index 1246aa6..2cc5616 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c
> @@ -529,7 +529,9 @@ static void allow_maximum_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> continue;
>
> instance->target = 0;
> + mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> instance->cdev->updated = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> index ea9366a..bcef2e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,9 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> update_passive_instance(tz, trip_type, -1);
>
> instance->initialized = true;
> + mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> instance->cdev->updated = false; /* cdev needs update */
> + mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index a0a8fd1..9d23109 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -1089,7 +1089,9 @@ int power_actor_set_power(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> return ret;
>
> instance->target = state;
> + mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
> cdev->updated = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
> thermal_cdev_update(cdev);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1619,11 +1621,13 @@ void thermal_cdev_update(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> struct thermal_instance *instance;
> unsigned long target = 0;
>
> + mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
> /* cooling device is updated*/
> - if (cdev->updated)
> + if (cdev->updated) {
> + mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
> return;
> + }
>
> - mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
> /* Make sure cdev enters the deepest cooling state */
> list_for_each_entry(instance, &cdev->thermal_instances, cdev_node) {
> dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%lu\n",
> @@ -1633,9 +1637,9 @@ void thermal_cdev_update(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> if (instance->target > target)
> target = instance->target;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
> cdev->ops->set_cur_state(cdev, target);
> cdev->updated = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
> trace_cdev_update(cdev, target);
> dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "set to state %lu\n", target);
> }
> --
> 1.9.1