Re: [PATCH] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu capacity

[Morten Rasmussen]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:43:47PM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> PELT does not consider SMT when scaling its utilization values via
> arch_scale_cpu_capacity(). The value in rq->cpu_capacity_orig does
> take SMT into consideration though and therefore may be smaller than
> the utilization reported by PELT.
> 
> On an Intel i7-3630QM for example rq->cpu_capacity_orig is 589 but
> util_avg scales up to 1024. This means that a 50% utilized CPU will show
> up in schedutil as ~86% busy.
> 
> Fix this by using the same CPU scaling value in schedutil as that which
> is used by PELT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 60d985f4dc47..cb8a77b1ef1b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,9 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long util,
>  static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
>  {
>  	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> -	unsigned long cfs_max = rq->cpu_capacity_orig;
> +	unsigned long cfs_max;
> +
> +	cfs_max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());

Until we have figured out how to define utilization (and capacity)
better for SMT I think this is a better solution.

Morten