Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: sun4i: fix a possible NULL dereference

From: Thierry Reding
Date: Wed Aug 24 2016 - 09:29:02 EST


On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 01:43:58PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer
> dereference later.
>
> For fixing this problem, we use of_device_get_match_data(), this will
> simplify the code a little by using a standard function for
> getting the match data.
>
> Testing the return value of of_device_get_match_data is also necessary
> for avoiding a second NULL deref on pwm->data.
>
> Reported-by: coverity (CID 1324139)
> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Add a test on pwm->data for avoiding a second NULL deref.
> Changes since v1:
> - Use of_device_get_match_data()
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 03a99a5..fb76c55 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -309,9 +309,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *res;
> u32 val;
> int i, ret;
> - const struct of_device_id *match;
> -
> - match = of_match_device(sun4i_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
>
> pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pwm)
> @@ -326,7 +323,9 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk))
> return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk);
>
> - pwm->data = match->data;
> + pwm->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!pwm->data)
> + return -EINVAL;

I don't see how this would ever be NULL. You'd have to add an entry to
the table that has a NULL data field, which is very unlikely to happen.
If you really want to check for this, which I think isn't necessary,
please wrap this in a WARN_ON() or something to make more noise when
this completely unexpected case happens.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature