Re: [PATCH 5/7] openrisc: Support both old (or32) and new (or1k) toolchain

[Stafford Horne]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 09/19/2016 07:04 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> >  On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > >  On 09/19/2016 02:11 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >   On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >   On 09/18/2016 11:02 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >    On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > > > >    Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > >    If you plan to handle openrisc going forward, it would be 
> > > > > > > >    great > > > >   if you >  could
> > > > > > >    consider updating MAINTAINERS. The web site and git repository 
> > > > > > >    have > > >   been >  unreachable
> > > > > > >    for a long time.
> > > > > > > >    Thank you,
> > > > > >    Updating maintainers was kind of on my plans, but I figured I 
> > > > > >    need to
> > > > > >    prove that I kind of know what I am doing.
> > > > > > > >   The alternative would be to mark it as Orphaned. Which, for 
> > > > > > > >   all >  practical purpose,
> > > > >   would be the correct state right now.
> > > > 
> > > >   +CC The openrisc list
> > > > 
> > > >   Understood, I don't think we would want that to happen.
> > > > 
> > >  Look at the entry today:
> > > 
> > >  OPENRISC ARCHITECTURE
> > >  M:      Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  W:      http://openrisc.net
> > >  S:      Maintained
> > >  T:      git git://openrisc.net/~jonas/linux
> > >  F:      arch/openrisc/
> > > 
> > >  At the very least, W: and T: are incorrect and need to be updated or 
> > >  removed.
> > >  Plus, apparently there is a L:, and "T: 
> > >  https://github.com/openrisc/linux";
> > >  might be appropriate.
> > > 
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  I am aware of this, we have since setup a new website, mailing list and as
> >  you have found, git repo. Stefan has been nominated as the maintainer by
> >  Jonas on a previous mail thread.
> >
> >  The issue (as we see it) is that neither Stefan or I have signed PGP keys
> >  by anyone in the web of trust.
> >
> >  I sent this patch set with a cover lett trying to explain of the situation
> >  trying to get some help.  Your reponses are very helpful.
> >
> >  Do you think I should just send "git pull" reuqests to Linus with a self
> >  signed pgp key and eplaination to see how it goes?
>
> Nope, that won't work. Linus will not accept pull requests without signed 
> key,
> or at least I would be very surprised if he does. You'll have to get your key
> signed. I understand that may be tricky, with you being in Japan (if that is
> you ;-), but we can't help it.

Thats as I figured.

It is me and I just missed LinuxCon Japan 2016 as I was out of town. I 
have some contacts I may be able to reach out to though.

-Stafford

> >  FYI
> >  I have a change as following in my backlog, as follows:
> >
> >  ---
> >  @@ -8691,10 +8063,12 @@ F:      drivers/of/overlay.c
> >   F:     drivers/of/resolver.c
> >
> >  OPENRISC ARCHITECTURE
> >  -M:    Jonas Bonn <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  -W:    http://openrisc.net
> >  +M:    Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  +M:    Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>
> >  +W:    http://openrisc.io
> >  +L:    openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  +T:    https://github.com/openrisc/linux.git
> >  S:    Maintained
> >  -T:    git git://openrisc.net/~jonas/linux
> >   F:    arch/openrisc/
> >
> >   OPENVSWITCH
> >
> >  --